I'm a full-stack developer with a passion for @nestjs and @nrwl. I love working with TypeScript and learning new ways to tackle common problems.
AI is analyzing your overall score…
Identifying your key strengths…
Evaluating your skill match against the job requirements…
Assessing your cultural and operational fit
throttler
May 30, 2020 – Present
A rate limiting module for NestJS to work with Fastify, Express, GQL, Websockets, and RPC 🧭
View Projecttesting-nestjs
July 25, 2019 – April 27, 2025
A repository to show off to the community methods of testing NestJS including Unit Tests, Integration Tests, E2E Tests, pipes, filters, interceptors, GraphQL, Mongo, TypeORM, and more!
View Projectgraphql
December 15, 2017 – Present
GraphQL (TypeScript) module for Nest framework (node.js) 🍷
View Projectswagger
October 1, 2017 – Present
OpenAPI (Swagger) module for Nest framework (node.js) :earth_americas:
View Projectawesome-nestjs
September 27, 2017 – Present
A curated list of awesome things related to NestJS 😎
View Projecttypescript-starter
February 25, 2017 – Present
Nest framework TypeScript starter :coffee:
View Projectnest
February 4, 2017 – Present
A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient, scalable, and enterprise-grade server-side applications with TypeScript/JavaScript 🚀
View ProjectCultural Fit Analysis
The candidate's projects are primarily focused on the NestJS ecosystem, indicating a strong passion and deep dive into a specific technology. While this shows dedication, the lack of diverse frontend-specific projects (e.g., React, Angular, Vue, UI/UX design, state management libraries) suggests a potential mismatch with a pure 'Frontend Developer' role that typically requires broader client-side expertise. The projects are all personal, which is good for initiative, but there's no indication of team collaboration or open-source contributions beyond their own framework modules.
Soft Skills & Operational Fit
Insufficient data to assess soft skills or operational fit. The candidate's project descriptions are concise and technical, but do not provide insight into collaboration, problem-solving approaches, or communication style.